Category: We Love Translations

There are eight complete translations of Gargantua and Pantagruel, plus one of just the first two parts.

For lots of details on all nine translations, please visit We Love Translations: World Literature in English:

» What’s the best translation of Gargantua and Pantagruel?

There are three modern translations in print, plus various updated versions of the original English translation from 1694, by Thomas Urquhart and Peter Anthony Motteux.

Urquhart’s parts of the translation are, like a lot of old, initial translations into English, not very exact. But maybe they don’t have to be; maybe energy, enthusiasm, and humor are more important in some sense, especially for a work like this one. Urquhart’s might not be the best translation, but it’s been around for hundreds of years; it’s a classic in its own right.

See below for a timeline and quotes describing some of the many various editions of the early translation efforts of Urquhart, and Motteux, who finished what Urquhart began.

Continue reading What’s the best translation of Gargantua and Pantagruel?

You might think there are only two translations to choose from. Well. That’s what *I* thought.

But after many, many hours of collecting and organizing information on Marcel Proust’s masterwork, I can tell you, the situation is much more complicated…

Head over to the first of my Lost Time pages on We Love Translations to learn how many versions of the Scott Moncrieff translation the Anglophone world has produced (and is still producing!), plus details (on the second page) about the Penguin Prendergast project and the rather nebulous new Nelson and Watt project.

Intimidated by the scope and scale of the complete Search? If you want, you can read just a fraction of it. Visit my Swann’s Way page on We Love Translations for information on just Volume 1, and on the novella Swann in Love (which is contained within Volume 1).

If you want a quick-and-dirty recommendation, why not read the new, complete, modern, multi-translator Penguin version? Or at least the first volume of it? Lydia Davis translated Penguin’s Swann’s Way. She has a lot of interesting things to say about her process, and others (mostly) say positive things about the result.

Buy the Davis translation of Swann’s Way on Amazon

For more on Davis’s translation, keep reading.

Continue reading What’s the best translation of In Search of Lost Time (Remembrance of Things Past)?

You’ve seen the Disney movie. Maybe you’ve read the novel. But do you recognize the name Frederic Shoberl? Probably not.

He’s the guy who chose the title we now use to refer to Victor Hugo’s novel, which was originally titled Notre-Dame de Paris. Shoberl wasn’t the first translator (the first was the politically motivated William Hazlitt), but his version gets the credit for hitting the bestseller list in England in the 1830s. (Hazlitt’s title was: Notre-Dame: A Tale of the Ancien Regime. Yawn.)

More about the publication history of The Hunchback of Notre-Dame below.

Continue reading What’s the best translation of The Hunchback of Notre-Dame?

Five years ago, someone on reddit said there are “very few” translations of The Three Musketeers into English.

Wrong!

There are at least nine, counting distinct translations still in print; arguably as many as sixteen, counting one edited translation, an abridged edition, a likely abridged translation that’s out of print, and four unabridged but out-of-print translations.

1. 1846 – Anonymous
2. 1846 – Park Benjamin (out of print)
3. 1846 – William Barrow
4. 1853 – William Robson
5. 1893 – H.L. Williams (abridged)
6. 1894 – A. Curtis Bond (out of print)
7. 1903 – Alfred Allinson (out of print)
8. 1950 – Lord Sudley (out of print)
9. 1950 – Jacques Le Clercq
10. 1952 – Isabel Ely Lord (abridged?)
11. 1984 – Lowell Bair
12. 1991 – Barrow edited by David Coward
13. 2006 – Richard Pevear
14. 2006 – Eleanor Hochman
15. 2014 – Will Hobson
16. 2018 – Lawrence Ellsworth

Nineteenth-century translations were bowdlerized; that is, they left out things that weren’t considered suited to Victorian readers’ tastes. The twenty-first-century translators of The Three Musketeers are putting that stuff back in, like Robin Buss did with The Count of Monte Cristo.

The popular translation these days seems to be the one by Pevear, best known for the translation he and his wife did of Anna Karenina, which led to many other translations of Russian works.

But the most intriguing one is the one by Ellsworth. That’s not even his name. His name is Lawrence Schick, and he only became a translator in the first place because he’s obsessed with historical storytelling for various types of role-playing games, and started reading Dumas in French, and then decided the existing English versions weren’t good enough—or complete enough. He dug up a lost sequel and has embarked on a project to translate a million and a half words of Dumas’ fiction. Hats off to you, Lawrence!

For details on all sixteen translations, including cover images, ISBNs, pagecounts, links to relevant articles, and extracts for comparison, visit my Three Musketeers posts at We Love Translations. Here’s a link to the first of the two:

» What’s the best translation of The Three Musketeers (Part 1)