How to Train Your Dragon (2025)

This movie is a remake of the 2010 animated movie How to Train Your Dragon. That means it’s time once again to play Spot the Differences!

Although there are some changes that I personally don’t like, I think they did a great job overall. (Still, the original was better.)

DreamWorks did less revamping than Disney has been doing in their live-action remakes of animated classics. It may be that few changes seemed necessary because 2010 wasn’t that long ago (the live-action Cinderella movie was made 65 years after the 1950 original), or it may be because DreamWorks made a conscious decision to change as little as possible, or it may be both. (Often it’s both.)

So what did change, and why?

You probably don’t want to read this post if you haven’t seen the new movie, and it won’t make sense at all if you haven’t seen the new movie or the old movie. Instead, please enjoy this photo of the counter where I bought gelato after exiting the cinema.

I chose sea-salt coconut, tiramisu, and blueberry. Mmmm!

Continue reading How to Train Your Dragon (2025)

Chevron amethyst sphere

Item description / significance
This is a natural purple polished amethyst ball with a white zig-zag line (chevron pattern) of white quartz running around it.

Bought where
in Shenzhen, in a shop in the home decor part of the Sungang Market

Age and origin
As far as I know, this piece is “new” (not previously owned by an individual). I don’t know where the amethyst was mined. Brazil?

What I like about it
It’s amethyst! The chevron pattern is clean and the purple is deep. I’m glad I got to see this sphere in person, because it meant that I could evaluate the quality of the stone in real life.

See below for more thoughts on and photos of this sphere.

Continue reading Chevron amethyst sphere

Mission Impossible: The Final Reckoning (2025)

I was disappointed with this movie for two reasons, one general and one personal:

  • The ending didn’t feel final, after so much buildup.
  • There was entirely too much water.

To elaborate on the lack of emotional finality: Some reviews say the ending was a gracious and moving send-off that tidily wraps up the whole movie series with meaningful callbacks and clever retconning. That is, of course, what they are supposed to say, so even if such assertions are sincere, they sound hollow. It’s an expensive movie, made by experienced people; naturally, we are expected to like and approve of it. But other reviews agree with my view: whatever the moviemakers may have been trying to do, it didn’t work as well as one might have hoped.

To elaborate on the excess of water: Classic case of “Well done, thanks, I hate it.” I personally hate underwater scenes. Hate hate hate them. They make me disproportionately anxious. I do not find them fun and entertaining, unlike other forms of danger (e.g., precipitous heights, car chases). I enjoy action movies in general, and action movies are exciting because the fictional hero (and in the case of Tom Cruise and Jackie Chan, to an unprecedented extent, the actor playing the fictional hero) is placed in life-threatening danger. But I hate water scenes. And this movie had one that went on for… I dunno, 20 minutes? I Googled and couldn’t immediately find the duration online, but one article said there was a single take in the movie that was 4 minutes long, so I don’t feel like 20 minutes is an unreasonable guess!

Canvas poster on display at my local movie theater, Wanda Cinema Yuhang.
We watched MI:8 in the biggest cinema hall the evening after the movie opened in China. Sadly, the theater was mostly empty. (Where my Chinese Tom Cruise fans at???)

More thoughts on Final Reckoning below, including plot spoilers.

Continue reading Mission Impossible: The Final Reckoning (2025)

The Maid of Sker by R. D. Blackmore

Wikipedia says, “Blackmore considered The Maid of Sker to be his best novel.” That’s why I read it. But I liked Lorna Doone much better.

(I guess readers can’t be expected to agree with authors about their work; Mark Twain liked Joan of Arc best of his novels, whereas I preferred Connecticut Yankee; E.M. Forster liked The Longest Journey best of all his novels, whereas I preferred A Room with a View.)

This 213,414-word novel is supposedly about a two-year-old high-born girl who mysteriously washes up alone in a boat on the coast of a farm called Sker. However, in actual fact, the book is about the narrator, an old Welsh fisherman and sailor, and could more accurately have been titled David Llewellyn of Newton-Nottage. Old Davy finds the child, who calls herself Bardie, in the summer of 1782, but the tale spans eighteen years, and Davy has spent most of them far away from Bardie. Large swaths of the book are devoted to Davy’s adventures in Devon, which eventually shed some light on Bardie’s origins—but large swaths of the book are also devoted to his adventures in the navy, which do not.

As a narrator, Old Davy suffers greatly in comparison to John Ridd, the narrator of Lorna Doone. Both men profess a commitment to honesty, but Old Davy not only exaggerates (particularly about himself, while pretending to be modest), he lies, and calls his rationalizations honesty! Early on in the novel, he describes to the reader how he tricks people into buying fish he caught that aren’t fresh anymore. That’s disgusting to me for three reasons: I don’t eat fish at all because I don’t like the taste; rotting fish don’t taste good even to people who normally like fish; habitually lying to and running from your customers is the opposite of admirable. He also poaches, smuggles, and simultaneously collects both a pension and a salary from the government. The louder he says he’s not doing something, the more certain you can be that he is (like the duck in the comic at this link). Davy is intended to be funny, and to an extent, he is. But to have this weasely, money-grubbing, boastful man conveying the story is intermittently quite irksome, especially when he says nothing whatsoever related to the maid of Sker for many pages at a time—and all the more when I already read a book by the same author that I thoroughly enjoyed.

Still, the book is a kind of unusually cheerful mystery; everything works out all right in the end, and it was entertaining enough to keep me interested along the way. The story’s origin as a serial publication probably explains the plot tangents.

See below for passages that illustrate the humor of Old Davy.

Continue reading The Maid of Sker by R. D. Blackmore

When and Why I Read The Maid of Sker

I'm reading this because I enjoyed Lorna Doone, by the same author.

Genre: English literature
Date started / date finished: 03-May-25 to 29-May-25
Length: 474 pages
ISBN:
Originally published in: 1872/2014/2024

Lois and Clark: The New Adventures of Superman (Season 1)

This 1990s TV show is a wholesome romance thinly disguised as science-fiction. Specifically, it’s about the relationship between two capable and kind-hearted but emotionally vulnerable young professionals. Rewatching Season 1 filled me with the glow of nostalgia.

See below for more on the characters, plot, and themes of the show. No spoilers.

Continue reading Lois and Clark: The New Adventures of Superman (Season 1)

Ghost in the Shell (1995)

It’s a niche classic. A strange blend of a lot of things at once.

It’s sci-fi, it’s action, it’s horror; it’s hand-drawn and computer animation; it’s made in Japan but set in Hong Kong; it’s about evolution but upholds the idea of the soul; and it’s futuristic but looks and feels and sounds like the past.

I wish I liked it, but I don’t; I still think it’s clunky and weird. Here are some previous thoughts (because apparently this is my third blog post on this same movie, omg):

Watched in 2017 (around the time of the remake)

Watched in 2013

How to Train Your Dragon (2010)

I didn’t see this 2010 movie for the first time until 2014, and I’m not sure I fully appreciated it at the time. It is probably one of my top five favorite movies ever.

It has a dragon who is unbelievably powerful and cool but also catlike, silly, and adorable; it has a geeky underdog protagonist with a gratifying self-actualization plot; it has a romantic subplot featuring an immensely capable and hardworking girl; it has an awesome soundtrack; and it has the best aerial joyrides!

Siqi put in the DVD of HTTYD to test our new living room audio setup: he connected a new (used) pair of speakers behind the sofa, so now our system is 5.1 instead of 3.1. Pretty awesome! 🙂

Personal Recollections of Joan of Arc by Mark Twain

Wikipedia says: “Twain was aware of his reputation as a comic writer and he asked that each installment appear anonymously so that readers would treat it seriously.”

This is, indeed, a serious book. It claims to be a translation, but it is historical fiction. My understanding is that the trial of Joan of Arc was so well documented that it gives a surprisingly good picture of life in 1400s France, and this extensive documentation served as the basis for Twain’s novel.

Twain’s narrator (speaking for Twain) says:

“I give you my honor now that I am not going to distort or discolor the facts of this miserable trial. No, I will give them to you honestly, detail by detail, just as Manchon and I set them down daily in the official record of the court, and just as one may read them in the printed histories. There will be only this difference: that in talking familiarly with you, I shall use my right to comment upon the proceedings and explain them as I go along, so that you can understand them better; also, I shall throw in trifles which came under our eyes and have a certain interest for you and me, but were not important enough to go into the official record.”

I misunderstood the title. I thought the title was THE Personal Recollections of Joan of Arc, which would have made it a memoir told from her point of view. But it’s not, as I learned upon beginning to read the book. It’s someone else’s personal recollections. My bad. It makes much more sense for the story to be told by someone close to her who survived her martyrdom, rather than for the story to be told by Joan herself, even given that it’s a novel.

I don’t think it works as a novel, though, to be frank. Certainly it’s not my favorite Twain novel, though he said it’s his favorite. I liked A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur’s Court better than this one. Quite possibly I liked all the books of his that I’ve read better than this one. Why is that?

Continue reading Personal Recollections of Joan of Arc by Mark Twain

Five tigers Chinese inside-painted glass ball

Item description / significance
This is an inside-painted (inner-painted, reverse painted) glass ball depicting five tigers.

Bought where
in China on Xianyu, the Chinese second-hand marketplace app (from a seller in Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, northern China)

Age and origin
Painted in 1992, according to the inscription, probably Hengshui, Hebei Province, in northern China

What I like about it
The facial expression of the tiger looking at the viewer is what sold me! I also like the fact that there are five tigers, and one is white. And of course, the quality of the painting (the level of detail) is high.

See below for photos of this sphere, including photos from the seller.

Continue reading Five tigers Chinese inside-painted glass ball

Exposed (2016)

This was advertised as a Keanu Reeves movie, but he’s not really the main character. The movie’s original title, “Daughter of God,” better reflects the fact that the movie is mainly about a young Catholic Spanish-speaking woman who has a strange experience late at night on a subway platform and starts seeing angels.

The movie turns out to be about rape and child abuse, not, as the standard summary claims, “police corruption.” So it was very heavy, with one particularly disturbing scene. You could argue that the movie has a happy ending, but the net effect of watching this movie was definitely the opposite of happiness. I would unwatch it if I could.

Incidentally, this movie is an interesting case of the use of unreliable narration in film. If it weren’t so disturbing, I’d want to watch it again and look for clues that what we’re shown initially isn’t what happened. It’s clever. But I hate the story.